http://ericschmiedl.com/blog/2007/08/holy-crap/ photography essays, photos of MIT, photos of MIT hacks, and a few other things Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:33:21 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 http://ericschmiedl.com/blog/2007/08/holy-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-3 Eric Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:51:30 +0000 http://ericschmiedl.com/blog/?p=25#comment-3 Exhibit B isn't supposed to be better than A. It's the straight-out-of-camera file, before it's been processed to give the big photo up top. (Also, exhibit B as well as the photo up top are not photos of hacked domes. Exhibit A is just an example.) Exhibit B isn’t supposed to be better than A. It’s the straight-out-of-camera file, before it’s been processed to give the big photo up top. (Also, exhibit B as well as the photo up top are not photos of hacked domes. Exhibit A is just an example.)

]]> http://ericschmiedl.com/blog/2007/08/holy-crap/comment-page-1/#comment-2 Dmitry Sun, 19 Aug 2007 20:07:38 +0000 http://ericschmiedl.com/blog/?p=25#comment-2 I don't understand... how is exhibit B better than exhibit A? In A you can see the colors at least, and in B you cannot. While I have not seen the hack, I am assuming that it has something to do with red and blue lights on the dome, while in exhibit B these colors are stripped off the image. I'd say that exhibit A is better. Maybe you mixed them up? I don’t understand… how is exhibit B better than exhibit A? In A you can see the colors at least, and in B you cannot. While I have not seen the hack, I am assuming that it has something to do with red and blue lights on the dome, while in exhibit B these colors are stripped off the image. I’d say that exhibit A is better. Maybe you mixed them up?

]]>